Unfortunately, we’ve had crickets from the directorates. Since we have a shepherd, I think we’ll kickoff a WG LC and hopefully that will encourage more eyes.
Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Date: Monday, October 23, 2023 at 12:54 To: Randy Bush <[email protected]>, Ops Area WG <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-05.txt Let me kick off some reviews in DT. From my chair perspective, I do think it’s close to WGLC. That should get a few more reviews. Joe From: OPSAWG <[email protected]> on behalf of Randy Bush <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 18:13 To: Ops Area WG <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsawg-9092-update-05.txt > authors pushed latest revision of $ubject. would very much like some > wg members, or anyone actually. to have a look and comment before we > decide if it is time to ask for wglc. well, that elicited only one poke (thanks ggm) :( chairs, think a wglc will elicit more? randy _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
