I'd like to see these docs advance as well.  My only question is whether the pcapng doc should be a Proposed Standard.

Eliot

On 15.11.2023 10:33, Michael Richardson wrote:
Hi, the three PCAP I-Ds have been stable for sometime now.

draft-ietf-opsawg-pcap-03    - going to Historic.
draft-ietf-opsawg-pcaplinktype - Standards Track to create Registry
draft-ietf-opsawg-pcapng-01  - going to Informational.

Can we WGLC them, and find shepherds for them?

--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
  -= IPv6 IoT consulting =-                      *I*LIKE*TRAINS*




_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Attachment: OpenPGP_0x87B66B46D9D27A33.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
OPSAWG mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg

Reply via email to