Carsten Bormann <[email protected]> wrote: >> I thought that we agreed that this justification for PS is not >> accurate (1): "linktypes "highest" level is Specification Required". A >> better reason should be provided.
> The draft doesn’t just register in that registry, it creates a registry.
> Note that I have tried multiple times to find out what the requirements
> on the document type/stream for creating a registry are, and I haven’t
> found anything.
I was told by Adrien Farrel, then ISE, that the ISE couldn't create
registries that potentially required any kind of IETF actions to fill them.
Now, we've changed the IANA Considerations since then, but that's where we
were a few years ago.
--
Michael Richardson <[email protected]>, Sandelman Software Works
-= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
