Rob, can you comment on this with respect to 9092 and the intent for this bis?
Thanks. Joe On 11/30/23, 09:24, "Michael Richardson" <[email protected]> wrote: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > I guess Rob has to call this out in the last call; please see RFC8067: > For Standards Track or BCP documents requiring normative > reference to documents of lower maturity, the normal IETF Last Call > procedure will be issued, with the need for the downward reference > explicitly documented in the Last Call itself. Any community comments > on the appropriateness of downward references will be considered by the > IESG as part of its deliberations. Yes, but it seems that this didn't happen when RFC9092 went through Last Call, and some of those references are occuring again. -- Michael Richardson <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>, Sandelman Software Works -= IPv6 IoT consulting =- *I*LIKE*TRAINS*
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
