The following errata report has been submitted for RFC8520, "Manufacturer Usage Description Specification".
-------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7819 -------------------------------------- Type: Technical Reported by: Russ Housley <hous...@vigilsec.com> Section: 13.1 Original Text ------------- Note: A MUD file may need to be re-signed if the signature expires. Corrected Text -------------- Note: A MUD file may need to be re-signed if the certificate needed to validate the signature expires. Notes ----- The signature does not expire, but the certificate does. Instructions: ------------- This erratum is currently posted as "Reported". (If it is spam, it will be removed shortly by the RFC Production Center.) Please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party will log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC8520 (draft-ietf-opsawg-mud-25) -------------------------------------- Title : Manufacturer Usage Description Specification Publication Date : March 2019 Author(s) : E. Lear, R. Droms, D. Romascanu Category : PROPOSED STANDARD Source : Operations and Management Area Working Group Area : Operations and Management Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list OPSAWG@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
