Hi Joe, all,
No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts. Samier On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 4:45 PM <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi all, > > > > An IPR poll check is launched by the Chairs because the documents are in > the WGLC. > > > > Please consider replying to the attached message in a timely manner. Thank > you much. > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > *De :* BOUCADAIR Mohamed INNOV/NET > *Envoyé :* vendredi 19 avril 2024 16:41 > *À :* 'Joe Clarke (jclarke)' <[email protected]>; > [email protected] > *Objet :* RE: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work > > > > Hi Joe, all, > > > > No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts. > > > > Cheers, > > Med > > > > *De :* OPSAWG <[email protected]> *De la part de* Joe Clarke > (jclarke) > *Envoyé :* vendredi 19 avril 2024 16:32 > *À :* [email protected] > *Objet :* [OPSAWG] IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work > > > > We’re up to WG LC on these four drafts. And while we did an IPR poll > before, we want to be thorough since this work has evolved. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-teas-common-ac/ > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue/ > > > > Are you aware of any IPR that applies to drafts identified above? > > > > Please state either: > > > > "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to these drafts” > > or > > "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to these drafts" > > > > If so, has this IPR been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules > > (see RFCs 3669, 5378 and 8179 for more details)? > > > > If yes to the above, please state either: > > > > "Yes, the IPR has been disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules” > > or > > "No, the IPR has not been disclosed" > > > > If you answer no, please provide any additional details you think > > appropriate. > > > > If you are listed as a document author or contributor please answer the > > above by responding to this email regardless of whether or not you are > > aware of any relevant IPR. This document will not advance to the next > > stage until a response has been received from each author. > > > > Also please send the response to the list above, and not unicast it. > > > > As of this time, no IPR has been disclosed on any of the four drafts. > > > > Joe > > ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________ > Ce message et ses pieces jointes peuvent contenir des informations > confidentielles ou privilegiees et ne doivent donc > pas etre diffuses, exploites ou copies sans autorisation. Si vous avez recu > ce message par erreur, veuillez le signaler > a l'expediteur et le detruire ainsi que les pieces jointes. Les messages > electroniques etant susceptibles d'alteration, > Orange decline toute responsabilite si ce message a ete altere, deforme ou > falsifie. Merci. > > This message and its attachments may contain confidential or privileged > information that may be protected by law; > they should not be distributed, used or copied without authorisation. > If you have received this email in error, please notify the sender and delete > this message and its attachments. > As emails may be altered, Orange is not liable for messages that have been > modified, changed or falsified. > Thank you. > >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
