In all thoroughness, yes 🙂
Juniper Business Use Only ________________________________ From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 2:41 PM To: Richard Roberts <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; mohamed.boucadair <[email protected]>; Oscar González de Dios <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Wubo (lana) <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Qin Wu <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work [External Email. Be cautious of content] Thanks, Richard. To be thorough, I assume you mean all four drafts? Joe Juniper Business Use Only From: Richard Roberts <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 05:17 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, mohamed.boucadair <[email protected]>, Oscar González de Dios <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Wubo (lana) <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, Qin Wu <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]>, [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work Hi Joe, No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft Juniper Business Use Only ________________________________ From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Sent: Monday, September 25, 2023 5:28 PM To: [email protected] <[email protected]>; mohamed.boucadair <[email protected]>; Richard Roberts <[email protected]>; Oscar González de Dios <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Wubo (lana) <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; Qin Wu <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]>; [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: IPR POLL: Attachment circuits work [External Email. Be cautious of content] This is a consolidated poll for the following drafts: · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-common-ac · draft-boro-opsawg-teas-attachment-circuit · draft-boro-opsawg-ntw-attachment-circuit · draft-boro-opsawg-ac-lxsm-lxnm-glue Authors and contributors on the To: line, please respond on-list as to whether or not you are aware of any IPR that pertains to this work. Please state either: "No, I'm not aware of any IPR that applies to this draft" or "Yes, I'm aware of IPR that applies to this draft" If you are aware of IPR, indicate whether or not this has been disclosed per IETF IPR rules (see RFCs 3669, 5378, and 8179). Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsawg
