Hi Joe, thank you for bringing minutes to the review. I noticed a minor issue with reflection of my comment to A YANG Data Model for Network Diagnosis by Scheduling Sequences of OAM Tests. I noted that RFC 8913 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8913/> that defines the TWAMP YANG model, does not allow control of TWAMP Lite (which is non-standard mode of TWAMP). Furthermore, in my comment I suggested checking STAMP YANG model <https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-12.html> which allows for scheduling periodic measurement sessions.
Regards, Greg On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 5:35 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke= [email protected]> wrote: > Thanks to Jean Quilbeuf for being our minutes-taker at our IETF 120 > opsawg/Ops Area meeting. I posted those to Data Tracker. Please review > and help us correct any issues or fill in any gaps. There are a few chair > AIs, which we will start to address in the coming weeks. > > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-120-opsawg-202407231630/ > > > > Joe > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] >
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
