Thanks, Greg. I updated your comments in HedgeDoc and reimported the minutes.
Joe From: Greg Mirsky <[email protected]> Date: Thursday, August 1, 2024 at 16:37 To: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] <[email protected]> Subject: Re: [OPSAWG]IETF 120 opsawg minutes posted Hi Joe, thank you for bringing minutes to the review. I noticed a minor issue with reflection of my comment to A YANG Data Model for Network Diagnosis by Scheduling Sequences of OAM Tests. I noted that RFC 8913<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc8913/> that defines the TWAMP YANG model, does not allow control of TWAMP Lite (which is non-standard mode of TWAMP). Furthermore, in my comment I suggested checking STAMP YANG model<https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-ippm-stamp-yang-12.html> which allows for scheduling periodic measurement sessions. Regards, Greg On Tue, Jul 30, 2024 at 5:35 PM Joe Clarke (jclarke) <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Thanks to Jean Quilbeuf for being our minutes-taker at our IETF 120 opsawg/Ops Area meeting. I posted those to Data Tracker. Please review and help us correct any issues or fill in any gaps. There are a few chair AIs, which we will start to address in the coming weeks. https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-120-opsawg-202407231630/ Joe _______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
