Benoît and I spoke, and since the comments on this work have been positive with a clear desire of some to progress this work, we think it’s worth adopting.
Med, please resubmit this draft as draft-ietf-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang-00 replacing the original. Do not change any other content within the document. After adoption, one question that was raised is should this be a bis to 9105 vs. a new module that augments 9105. Med, please start a thread to that effect. Joe From: Joe Clarke (jclarke) <jclarke=40cisco....@dmarc.ietf.org> Date: Tuesday, October 22, 2024 at 09:24 To: opsawg@ietf.org <opsawg@ietf.org> Subject: [OPSAWG]CALL FOR ADOPTION: A YANG Model for Terminal Access Controller Access-Control System Plus (TACACS+) over TLS 1.3 The IPR poll has concluded (no known IPR has been disclosed), and we would like to start a two week adoption poll for draft-boucadair-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-boucadair-opsawg-secure-tacacs-yang/>. Please respond on-list with support and especially comments. The adoption call will run until November 5. Thanks. Joe
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- opsawg@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to opsawg-le...@ietf.org
