Hi Michael, Thanks first of all for providing your feedback. Can you confirm if the -08 version of the draft addresses your comments?
Cheers. > On Oct 16, 2025, at 12:56 PM, Michael Richardson <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Randy Bush <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Section 5 about WHOIS data suggests FTP over WHOIS. >>>>> Given that there are ~5 RIRs, I guess the choice of FTP,WHOIS,RDAP >>>>> can be made by a human... >>> >>> I'm not sure, but I do not think you are asking for a change here. > > Correct, I'm not asking for a change. > >> the point is that whois is a tweezers, picking one object at a time, use >> of which is rude in bulk. > > If there were 100 sources of info (100 RIRs...), then the question of which > protocol to use would need more instruction. Given 5... meh. > *FTP* surprised me on first read but it's a definitely good choice for bulk. > If some RIR didn't support RDAP or wanted RDAP rather than FTP or... all > things that can be tweaked, given that there are only five. > > -- > Michael Richardson <[email protected]> . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting ) > Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] > To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected] Mahesh Jethanandani [email protected]
_______________________________________________ OPSAWG mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
