A few nits:

* Third paragraph in the introduction, "One one hand". Perhaps "On one hand" ?
* Title of section 2 should be fully bolded, missing bold on 'Techniques'
* 3.1.1.4. Stable Privacy-Enhanced Addresses

   In response to the predictability issues discussed in Section 3.1.1.1
   and the privacy issues discussed in , the IETF is currently **
(discussed in what,3.1.1.2? )

--John

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Arturo Servin <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>         I support WG adoption of draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-02.
>
>         There are some comments that I have and I will send them later, 
> however
> their are not in opposition to wg adoption.
>
> Regards,
> as
>
>
> On 27/11/2012 10:44, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve) wrote:
>> Dear,
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   Please find this request for WG adoption for “Network Reconnaissance
>>   in IPv6 Networks”
>>
>>
>>   This work is to update RFC5157. Please speak to voice your opinion.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   Latest draft can be found at:
>>
>> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-02
>>
>>
>>
>> Kind Regards,
>>
>> OPSEC chairs
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> OPSEC mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec



On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:44 AM, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Dear,
>
>
>
> Please find this request for WG adoption for “Network Reconnaissance in IPv6
> Networks”
>
> This work is to update RFC5157. Please speak to voice your opinion.
>
>
>
> Latest draft can be found at:
>
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-opsec-ipv6-host-scanning-02
>
>
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> OPSEC chairs
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
>
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to