For some reason this seems to have been eaten by the mailer… 

Resending…

W

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Warren Kumari <[email protected]>
> Subject: Reminder about IPR relating to 
> draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets 
> Date: January 24, 2013 12:02:07 PM EST
> To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, 
> [email protected], opsec chairs 
> <[email protected]>
> Cc: Warren Kumari <[email protected]>
> 
> Dear OpSec WG,
> 
> Be not alarmed.                                                               
>                                                   
> This email was created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with 
> Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)"  (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt). 
>                                                                               
>                              
> 
> We are doing the IPR reminder in parallel with the WGLC so that we have all 
> our ducks in a row...                                                         
>                                                                        
> 
> Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to 
> draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets?  If so, has this IPR been 
> disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules?
> (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.)
> 
> If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, please 
> reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are personally aware of 
> any relevant IPR.  We might not be able to advance this document to the next 
> stage until we have received a reply from each author and listed contributor.
> 
> If you are on the OpSec WG email list but are not an author or listed 
> contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for a 
> voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79.  Please do not reply unless you want 
> to make such a voluntary disclosure.
> 
> Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at 
> <http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure>.
> 
> Thanks,
> Warren Kumari
> (as OpSec WG co-chair)
> 
> --
> "I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to 
> understand the fundamental workings of the universe via a language devised 
> for telling one another when the best fruit is." --Terry Prachett 
> 
> 

--
"I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to understand 
the fundamental workings of the universe via a language devised for telling one 
another when the best fruit is." --Terry Prachett 


_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to