Hi, Warren, Sorry for being late. I'm personally not aware of any relevant IPR. Thanks.
Regards, Will > -------- Original Message -------- > From: Warren Kumari <[email protected]> > Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:39:23 -0500 > Cc: Warren Kumari <[email protected]> > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Message-Id: <[email protected]> > References: <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] <[email protected]>, > [email protected] > <[email protected]>, opsec > chairs <[email protected]> > Subject: Fwd: Reminder about IPR relating to > draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets > > For some reason this seems to have been eaten by the mailer... > > Resending... > > W > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: Warren Kumari <[email protected]> > > Subject: Reminder about IPR relating to > draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets > > Date: January 24, 2013 12:02:07 PM EST > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, > [email protected], opsec chairs > <[email protected]> > > Cc: Warren Kumari <[email protected]> > > > > Dear OpSec WG, > > > > Be not alarmed. > > This email was created to satisfy RFC 6702 "Promoting Compliance with > Intellectual Property Rights (IPR)" (http://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc6702.txt). > > > > We are doing the IPR reminder in parallel with the WGLC so that we have > all our ducks in a row... > > > > Are you personally aware of any IPR that applies to > draft-ietf-opsec-ipv6-implications-on-ipv4-nets? If so, has this IPR been > disclosed in compliance with IETF IPR rules? > > (See RFCs 3979, 4879, 3669, and 5378 for more details.) > > > > If you are a document author or listed contributor on this document, > please reply to this email regardless of whether or not you are personally > aware of any relevant IPR. We might not be able to advance this document > to the next stage until we have received a reply from each author and listed > contributor. > > > > If you are on the OpSec WG email list but are not an author or listed > contributor for this document, you are reminded of your opportunity for a > voluntary IPR disclosure under BCP 79. Please do not reply unless you want > to make such a voluntary disclosure. > > > > Online tools for filing IPR disclosures can be found at > <http://www.ietf.org/ipr/file-disclosure>. > > > > Thanks, > > Warren Kumari > > (as OpSec WG co-chair) > > > > -- > > "I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to > understand the fundamental workings of the universe via a language devised > for telling one another when the best fruit is." --Terry Prachett > > > > > > -- > "I think perhaps the most important problem is that we are trying to > understand the fundamental workings of the universe via a language > devised for telling one another when the best fruit is." --Terry Prachett > > > > _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
