Hello Ran, Thanks for those clarification, especially with reference to IETF historical approach to handling last call comments period.
Kind Regards sent from Google nexus 4 On 11 Dec 2013 20:26, "RJ Atkinson" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 11 Dec 2013, at 13:53 , Seun Ojedeji wrote: > > I am looking at the section below and i am wondering whether the part in > > bold could be removed to avoid un-necessary query from members of the > > various groups who were not contacted "offlist". > > The IETF's basic principle is that ALL feedback is considered > for an IETF track document. > > The specific text was added to this document during handling > of Last Call comments in an effort to clarify that all inputs > also were considered in this specific case. > > Accepting off-list feedback, in addition to accepting on-list > feedback, has been both common and acceptable practice within > the IETF for more than 20 years (from my own first-hand knowledge). > > As an example, for many I-Ds where I am the person commenting > on someone else's document, I send the authors/editors unicast > email in order to avoid disturbing an entire mailing list with > my humble suggestions. It is the choice of the person sending > the comments whether they wish to send those to a list or just > send them to the authors/editors. > > Yours, > > Ran > >
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
