On 20/08/2014 10:29, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Fernando Gont <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I must say that I fail to see the need for generating IPv6 atomic >> fragments 8packets with a frag header, which are not really fragmented). >> See e.g. what we wrote in >> < >> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-gont-6man-deprecate-atomfrag-generation-00 >>> . > > It does seem kind of silly that we say "you must support MTU >= 1280 to run > IPv6" and then allow PTB packets with an MTU < 1280. Any reason we can't > simply say that PTB packets < 1280 are invalid?
Because of SIIT, that is equivalent to saying that the minimum IPv4 MTU is now 1260. That might be a discussion worth having, but 576 has been around for a long time. Brian _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
