On 20/08/2014 11:01, Lorenzo Colitti wrote: > On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Brian E Carpenter < > [email protected]> wrote: > >>> Any reason we can't simply say that PTB packets < 1280 are invalid? >> Because of SIIT, that is equivalent to saying that the minimum IPv4 >> MTU is now 1260. That might be a discussion worth having, but 576 has >> been around for a long time. >> > > Can we then say that PTB packets < 1280 are invalid and should be ignored > by hosts? Or should be ignored unless they are running a SIIT translator?
The host doesn't know in general if there is a translator downstream (except in a DNS64/NAT64 scenario). Brian _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
