Hi,
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0000, Marco Ermini wrote:
> NAT can be still necessary in IPv6 in dual-stack scenario, for instance,
> where every host is assigned both a IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and the CGN
> equipment can't handle them differently. Unfortunately RFC 4864 does not
> mention such case, AFAIK.
Why would anyone route their IPv6 traffic to the IPv4 CGN box?
CGN boxes are way expensive, so anyone with a calculator would route
everything that does not need NAT around the CGN box.
Gert Doering
-- NetMaster
--
have you enabled IPv6 on something today...?
SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard
Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann
D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen)
Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
