To access IPv4-only enabled hosts?
Regards, Marco Ermini CISSP, CISA, CISM, CEH, ITIL, MCP, PhD Senior IT Security Analyst D +49 (0)899 901 1523 M +49 (0)175 439 5642 ResMed Germany Inc -----Original Message----- From: Gert Doering [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 1:48 PM To: Marco Ermini Cc: Mark Smith; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Subject: Re: [v6ops] [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08 Hi, On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:03:25AM +0000, Marco Ermini wrote: > NAT can be still necessary in IPv6 in dual-stack scenario, for instance, > where every host is assigned both a IPv4 and IPv6 addresses and the CGN > equipment can't handle them differently. Unfortunately RFC 4864 does not > mention such case, AFAIK. Why would anyone route their IPv6 traffic to the IPv4 CGN box? CGN boxes are way expensive, so anyone with a calculator would route everything that does not need NAT around the CGN box. Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
