On 24/11/18 17:21, Brian E Carpenter wrote: > On 2018-11-25 06:04, Joe Touch wrote: >> Equally worrisome that this doc appears to make recommendations that imply >> BCP, when it is merely informational. >> >> IMO, it’s overstepping to do so. > > Possibly, but it's not forbidden by rule, as far as I know. However, the > draft is inconsistent in its use of SHOULD vs should (see my previous > message for an example of a lower case should which might or might not > be intended pseudo-normatively).
Ack. We will make sure there's consistent use. Thanks! Cheers, -- Fernando Gont SI6 Networks e-mail: [email protected] PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492 _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
