> On Nov 25, 2018, at 11:54 PM, Fernando Gont <[email protected]> wrote: > > What this doc tries to do is to analyze the possible effects of > different types and options, and only advice to drop them when there is > a clear reason to do so. It claims those actions based on security. This is not a security issue. It is a revenue preservation issue. There is a big difference between using a protocol feature and abusing it. The implication that merely using some of these features is a security issue and an abuse is the problem with this document - and the approach of similar documents. Joe _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Stewart Bryant
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Joe Touch
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Christopher Morrow
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Joe Touch
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Gert Doering
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Stewart Bryant
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Benjamin Kaduk
- Re: [OPSEC] [Tsv-art] Tsvart ... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call revi... Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call ... Joe Touch
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call ... Eric Rescorla
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call ... Mark Andrews
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of draft-i... Fernando Gont
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-opsec... C. M. Heard
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of draft-ietf-... Christopher Morrow
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of draft-i... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of dra... Joe Touch
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of... Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call revi... Joe Touch
- Re: [OPSEC] Tsvart last call review of dra... Christopher Morrow
