Roman Danyliw has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- (1) I support Alvaro Retana’s DISCUSS point about the needed clarity on algorithm selection (A vs. B) and the security assumptions being made about Algorithm A. (2) Editorial -- Document header: s/Updates: RFC3704/Updates: 3704/ -- Section 2.1. Editorial. s/are maintained which list/are maintained to list/ _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
