Hi Sriram! > -----Original Message----- > From: Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Wednesday, August 21, 2019 7:21 PM > To: The IESG <[email protected]>; Roman Danyliw <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected]; Sandra Murphy > <[email protected]>; [email protected]; Sandra Murphy > <[email protected]>; [email protected] > Subject: Re: Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf- > improvements-03: (with COMMENT) > > Hi Roman, > > Thank you for your comments. > My responses marked with "[KS:]" below. > > ________________________________________ > From: Roman Danyliw via Datatracker <[email protected]> > Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 3:13 PM > ... > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > COMMENT: > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > > (1) I support Alvaro Retana's DISCUSS point about the needed clarity on > algorithm selection (A vs. B) and the security assumptions being made about > Algorithm A. > > [KS:] Yes. I am updating the draft per Alvaro's > recommendations/suggestions. > > (2) Editorial > > -- Document header: s/Updates: RFC3704/Updates: 3704/ > > [KS:] Yes. Done. > > -- Section 2.1. Editorial. s/are maintained which list/are maintained to > list/ > > [KS:] Done.
Thanks for these updates. Roman _______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
