We have a victimteer! I will request publication......

                                  Ron



Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: Gyan Mishra <[email protected]> 
Sent: Monday, October 14, 2019 7:55 PM
To: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>
Cc: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]>; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt

Ron

I read the document thoroughly in its entirety and do have valuable real world 
experience in this space so I am volunteering.

Not sure what I am getting myself into.😀

Gyan

Sent from my iPhone

> On Oct 14, 2019, at 7:14 PM, Ron Bonica 
> <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Jen,
> 
> I am ready to request publication. But before we do that, we need a document 
> shepherd.
> 
> Eric,
> 
> Was there anyone who was close to the draft, but not a co-author. We can 
> victimteer that person.
> 
>                                                      Ron
> 
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> 
> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 3:41 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: Jen Linkova <[email protected]>; Ron Bonica <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
> 
> As you will notice in 
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$
>   this latest revision addresses a suggestion by Gyan Mishra issued during 
> the Working Group Last Call. Other changes are mainly replacing the normative 
> "MUST" and "SHOULD" as it is an informational document (so it is now "must" 
> and "should") + removing an unused informational reference.
> 
> Jen and Ron, as the authors have addressed all comments received during the 
> WGLC (actually by only one reviewer) and the extensive review by Jen, may I 
> kindly request publication of this document?
> 
> Thank  you all
> 
> -éric -merike - kk -enno
> 
> 
> On 12/10/2019, 09:34, "OPSEC on behalf of [email protected]" 
> <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>    A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts 
> directories.
>    This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities for IP 
> Network Infrastructure WG of the IETF.
> 
>            Title           : Operational Security Considerations for IPv6 
> Networks
>            Authors         : Eric Vyncke
>                              Kiran K. Chittimaneni
>                              Merike Kaeo
>                              Enno Rey
>        Filename        : draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt
>        Pages           : 52
>        Date            : 2019-10-12
> 
>    Abstract:
>       Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is
>       available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal
>       network.  However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges.  RFC
>       4942 describes the security issues in the protocol but network
>       managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to
>       enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices.
> 
>       This document analyzes the operational security issues in several
>       places of a network (enterprises, service providers and residential
>       users) and proposes technical and procedural mitigations techniques.
>       Some very specific places of a network such as the Internet of Things
>       are not discussed in this document.
> 
> 
>    The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>    
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVgtmnGd$
>  
> 
>    There are also htmlized versions available at:
>    
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCQdAq-nG$
>  
>    
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCTaFWv3h$
>  
> 
>    A diff from the previous version is available at:
>    
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$
>  
> 
> 
>    Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> submission
>    until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> 
>    Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>    
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCXkuUebd$
>  
> 
>    _______________________________________________
>    OPSEC mailing list
>    [email protected]
>    
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVjA-7t2$
>  
> 
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec__;!8WoA6RjC81c!VnqIjb0Af5mFbeynR6Y3n3JSJLOihoseNIj6ePTntprga02MeYREnPIbCzduWAeD$
>  
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to