Hi Gyan, No IPRs on my end.
Thanks, KK On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 11:36 AM Gyan Mishra <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Eric > > I am completing the Shepards writeup in essay format. Plan to submit in > the next few days. > > As far as WG consensus and history on the document from its initial I-D > state were there any nits other then what is public in the tracker or any > WG consensus issues or topics discussed that I should be aware of to > include in the write up. I assume we finally reached WG consensus on all > topics with no outstanding issues as we are now ready to publish. > > Are there any IPRs disclosed or outstanding. > > Regards, > > Gyan > > Sent from my iPhone > > > On Oct 15, 2019, at 2:12 AM, Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Gyan, > > > > Thank you very much for being 'victimteered' as the document shepherd > [1] __ > > > > Thank you Jen and Ron for your support > > > > Regards > > > > -éric and the authors -kk -merike -enno > > > > [1] see > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/edit/shepherdwriteup/ > (you need to create a free account on datatracker if not yet done), the > mailing list archive should also be a source of information > https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/opsec/?q=draft-ietf-opsec-v6 > > > > > > On 15/10/2019, 01:54, "Gyan Mishra" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Ron > > > > I read the document thoroughly in its entirety and do have valuable > real world experience in this space so I am volunteering. > > > > Not sure what I am getting myself into.😀 > > > > Gyan > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > >> On Oct 14, 2019, at 7:14 PM, Ron Bonica <rbonica= > [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Jen, > >> > >> I am ready to request publication. But before we do that, we need a > document shepherd. > >> > >> Eric, > >> > >> Was there anyone who was close to the draft, but not a co-author. We > can victimteer that person. > >> > >> Ron > >> > >> > >> > >> Juniper Business Use Only > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Eric Vyncke (evyncke) <[email protected]> > >> Sent: Saturday, October 12, 2019 3:41 AM > >> To: [email protected] > >> Cc: Jen Linkova <[email protected]>; Ron Bonica <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [OPSEC] I-D Action: draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt > >> > >> As you will notice in > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$ > this latest revision addresses a suggestion by Gyan Mishra issued during > the Working Group Last Call. Other changes are mainly replacing the > normative "MUST" and "SHOULD" as it is an informational document (so it is > now "must" and "should") + removing an unused informational reference. > >> > >> Jen and Ron, as the authors have addressed all comments received during > the WGLC (actually by only one reviewer) and the extensive review by Jen, > may I kindly request publication of this document? > >> > >> Thank you all > >> > >> -éric -merike - kk -enno > >> > >> > >> On 12/10/2019, 09:34, "OPSEC on behalf of [email protected]" < > [email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts > directories. > >> This draft is a work item of the Operational Security Capabilities > for IP Network Infrastructure WG of the IETF. > >> > >> Title : Operational Security Considerations for > IPv6 Networks > >> Authors : Eric Vyncke > >> Kiran K. Chittimaneni > >> Merike Kaeo > >> Enno Rey > >> Filename : draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20.txt > >> Pages : 52 > >> Date : 2019-10-12 > >> > >> Abstract: > >> Knowledge and experience on how to operate IPv4 securely is > >> available: whether it is the Internet or an enterprise internal > >> network. However, IPv6 presents some new security challenges. RFC > >> 4942 describes the security issues in the protocol but network > >> managers also need a more practical, operations-minded document to > >> enumerate advantages and/or disadvantages of certain choices. > >> > >> This document analyzes the operational security issues in several > >> places of a network (enterprises, service providers and residential > >> users) and proposes technical and procedural mitigations > techniques. > >> Some very specific places of a network such as the Internet of > Things > >> are not discussed in this document. > >> > >> > >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-opsec-v6/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVgtmnGd$ > >> > >> There are also htmlized versions available at: > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCQdAq-nG$ > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCTaFWv3h$ > >> > >> A diff from the previous version is available at: > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-20__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCfC0QrYg$ > >> > >> > >> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > >> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. > >> > >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCXkuUebd$ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OPSEC mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec__;!8WoA6RjC81c!R2vH-_v3NugiwIfTcXccEC89zGAXYR4rIB7oMxgV_5Tl11Z9jXZgMMuVCVjA-7t2$ > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> OPSEC mailing list > >> [email protected] > >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > OPSEC mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec >
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
