Folks,
This appears to be a well-written draft that reflects current practice.
Could I ask for two volunteers to read and comment on the draft?
Ron
Juniper Business Use Only
From: OPSEC <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Kirsty P
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 6:19 AM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Ollie Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Subject: [OPSEC] Fw: New Version Notification for
draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
[External Email. Be cautious of content]
Hi OPSEC,
Please see below for details of our new draft on Indicators of Compromise
(IoCs), updated based on previous comments. We think it might be suitable for
OPSEC, but we'd like to hear your comments, discussion or feedback on this
draft - please get in touch!
Kirsty & Ollie
________________________________
From: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: 13 January 2021 17:44
To: Kirsty P <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Kirsty P
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>; Ollie Whitehouse
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Subject: New Version Notification for
draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
A new version of I-D, draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
has been successfully submitted by Kirsty Paine and posted to the
IETF repository.
Name: draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise
Revision: 02
Title: Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and Their Role in Attack Defence
Document date: 2021-01-13
Group: Individual Submission
Pages: 18
URL:
https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
Status:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise/
Htmlized:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise
Htmlized:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02
Diff:
https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02
Abstract:
Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) are an important technique in attack
defence (often called cyber defence). This document outlines the
different types of IoC, their associated benefits and limitations,
and discusses their effective use. It also contextualises the role
of IoCs in defending against attacks through describing a recent case
study. This draft does not pre-suppose where IoCs can be found or
should be detected - as they can be discovered and deployed in
networks, endpoints or elsewhere - rather, engineers should be aware
that they need to be detectable (either by endpoints, security
appliances or network-based defences, or ideally all) to be
effective. The purpose of this draft is to document both the
operational issues, but also the best practices associated with use
of IoCs today. This draft provides a foundation for proposals for
new approaches to operational challenges in network security.
Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
The IETF Secretariat
This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA) and
may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer any FOIA queries to
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>. All material is UK
Crown Copyright (c)
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
