Thanks!

Juniper Business Use Only

-----Original Message-----
From: OPSEC <[email protected]> On Behalf Of Fernando Gont
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 1:19 AM
To: Ron Bonica <[email protected]>; Kirsty P 
<[email protected]>; [email protected]
Cc: Ollie Whitehouse <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [OPSEC] New Version Notification for 
draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt

[External Email. Be cautious of content]


Hi, Ron,

I can volunteer for reviewing this draft if that'd be of help.

Thanks!

Regards,
Fernando




On 3/2/21 14:03, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
>
> This appears to be a well-written draft that reflects current practice.
>
> Could I ask for two volunteers to read and comment on the draft?
>
>                                                             Ron
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> *From:* OPSEC <[email protected]> *On Behalf Of * Kirsty P
> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 26, 2021 6:19 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Cc:* Ollie Whitehouse <[email protected]>
> *Subject:* [OPSEC] Fw: New Version Notification for 
> draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
>
> *[External Email. Be cautious of content]*
>
> Hi OPSEC,
>
> Please see below for details of our new draft on Indicators of 
> Compromise (IoCs), updated based on previous comments. We think it 
> might be suitable for OPSEC, but we'd like to hear your comments, 
> discussion or feedback on this draft - please get in touch!
>
> Kirsty & Ollie
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> --
>
> *From:*[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> 
> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
> *Sent:* 13 January 2021 17:44
> *To:* Kirsty P <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; 
> Kirsty P <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>; Ollie 
> Whitehouse <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>>
> *Subject:* New Version Notification for 
> draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, 
> draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Kirsty Paine and posted to the IETF 
> repository.
>
> Name:           draft-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise
> Revision:       02
> Title:          Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) and Their Role in Attack
> Defence
> Document date:  2021-01-13
> Group:          Individual Submission
> Pages:          18
> URL:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-pain
> e-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02.txt__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VcW92ERPAPayFO
> lFzJEh-DIIcloEr885XwOQTqB4SgLNP76lq-_wkqRxnGvUm5F7$
> Status:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-pai
> ne-smart-indicators-of-compromise/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VcW92ERPAPayFOlFzJE
> h-DIIcloEr885XwOQTqB4SgLNP76lq-_wkqRxnJcMSZWa$
> Htmlized:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draf
> t-paine-smart-indicators-of-compromise__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VcW92ERPAPayFOl
> FzJEh-DIIcloEr885XwOQTqB4SgLNP76lq-_wkqRxnBO_ajPm$
> Htmlized:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-paine-sm
> art-indicators-of-compromise-02__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VcW92ERPAPayFOlFzJEh-D
> IIcloEr885XwOQTqB4SgLNP76lq-_wkqRxnCdEa4wA$
> Diff:
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-pa
> ine-smart-indicators-of-compromise-02__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VcW92ERPAPayFOlF
> zJEh-DIIcloEr885XwOQTqB4SgLNP76lq-_wkqRxnNzNmLSB$
>
> Abstract:
>     Indicators of Compromise (IoCs) are an important technique in attack
>     defence (often called cyber defence).  This document outlines the
>     different types of IoC, their associated benefits and limitations,
>     and discusses their effective use.  It also contextualises the role
>     of IoCs in defending against attacks through describing a recent case
>     study.  This draft does not pre-suppose where IoCs can be found or
>     should be detected - as they can be discovered and deployed in
>     networks, endpoints or elsewhere - rather, engineers should be aware
>     that they need to be detectable (either by endpoints, security
>     appliances or network-based defences, or ideally all) to be
>     effective.  The purpose of this draft is to document both the
>     operational issues, but also the best practices associated with use
>     of IoCs today.  This draft provides a foundation for proposals for
>     new approaches to operational challenges in network security.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of 
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at 
> tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
>
> This information is exempt under the Freedom of Information Act 2000
> (FOIA) and may be exempt under other UK information legislation. Refer 
> any FOIA queries to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>. All material is UK Crown Copyright (c)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> OPSEC mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opse
> c__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VcW92ERPAPayFOlFzJEh-DIIcloEr885XwOQTqB4SgLNP76lq-_w
> kqRxnEY1aznN$
>


--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [email protected]
PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492




_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!VcW92ERPAPayFOlFzJEh-DIIcloEr885XwOQTqB4SgLNP76lq-_wkqRxnEY1aznN$

_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec

Reply via email to