Thanks, Dale. 9098 was more what I was thinking. I don't believe I have read that but will do so now.
nb On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 10:03 AM Dale W. Carder <[email protected]> wrote: > Thus spake Nick Buraglio ([email protected]) on Thu, May 18, > 2023 at 09:49:21AM -0500: > > Is there any document that details the current operational best practices > > or explains the EH options and use cases in a succinct document? > > Sort of in RFC9098. (Note there's also a lot of references in section 5 > also.) > > I've always thought that as an operational resource, RFC4890 did a > phenomenal job, but I'm not as sure the guidance would be as clear cut > for extension headers generally. > > Dale >
_______________________________________________ OPSEC mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
