On 26/5/23 18:01, Tom Herbert wrote:
On Fri, May 26, 2023 at 8:12 AM Fernando Gont <[email protected]> wrote:
[...]
That said, I'm not that fine if invited to a party where, if anything, I
will only pay the bills. So, I block everything that I don't use. e.g.,
I have no use for EHs in any of my servers, except the pentesting boxes
that I use to send weird packets to others.
Fernando,
If you're making that decision as the operator of a public network
then you are not making that decision for yourself, but you're making
RFC9098.
a "big brother" decision for others and preventing permissionless
innovation as Brian stated nicely. I don't believe it could be claimed
that this is for "the good of the Internet".
Companies are run to make money, not for the good of the Internet.
And if your clients get downtime as a result of you keeping things wide
open "for the good Internet", you'll likely have an interesting
(unpleasant) conversation with your upstream management.
Thanks,
--
Fernando Gont
SI6 Networks
e-mail: [email protected]
PGP Fingerprint: F242 FF0E A804 AF81 EB10 2F07 7CA1 321D 663B B494
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
