I love the new graphing system.  It's so much easier to get more  
meaningful information out of the graphs rather than having everything  
averaged into oblivion once you get past a day unless you have very  
gradual value changes.

I agree that it's much harder to integrate the generated graphs into  
other applications, though.  You'd have to write your own scripts to  
generate images for you from the RRDs which isn't a big deal but it's  
a lot more work than none.  :)

The fact that all the times are GMT does bother me, though.  I've  
spent a bit of time trying to figure out what's going on but I think  
there isn't much that I can do without going elbows-deep.

I also feel like the drag-zoom selector isn't very accurate.   
Sometimes I have to try a few times to figure out what I actually need  
to hilite to get the information I'm interested in.  The panning  
doesn't work very well either.  Both work great in FireFox.  But not  
in IE or Safari which are the only other browsers that I have tried.

-David



On Nov 27, 2009, at 1:48 AM, Kang wrote:

> Hello
>
> The new interface of Opsview 3.5.0 is very nice.
> But the javascript-ajax based new graph framework is not fully  
> satisfying.
>
> it's lack of customizable options compare to old rrdgraph( upper/ 
> lower limit, static cur/min/max legend label, fast static image  
> rendering, etc.)
> and it seems that xtics of graphs don't show local timestamp but GMT  
> timestamp.
>
> I've found I can still use RRDgraph with /graphrrd url instead of / 
> graph but right-upper side slide menu disappeared.
> Are you planing to continute to maintain both graph framework  
> together?
>
> I prefer static image RRDgraph to javascript-ajax based graph.
> because It is fast and easy to integrate with other system.
>
> What do you think about that?
>
> <ATT00001..txt>

_______________________________________________
Opsview-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users

Reply via email to