There are more issues with Firefox that doesn’t show the pages like it should. 

  

In IE the pages are dynamically filled with the whole table, as where in 
Firefox the width is fixed it seems. 

  

  

Toni Van Remortel 

System Engineer @ Precision Operations N.V. 

+32 3 451 92 20 - [email protected] 

Satenrozen 2a, 2550 Kontich, Belgium 


  

From:[email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Kirk Frankovich
Sent: woensdag 2 december 2009 18:22
To: Opsview Users
Subject: Re: [opsview-users] opsview 3.5.0 graph 



  

Ton, 

  

Has anyone had a chance to check the Firefox issue?  It appears Firefox is 
unable to display the Y axis. 

  

Thank you. 

  

From:[email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ton Voon
Sent: Wednesday, December 02, 2009 11:18 AM
To: Opsview Users
Subject: Re: [opsview-users] opsview 3.5.0 graph 



  

Thanks for your opinions. A few things are coming out of this: 

  


1) Keep the old /rrdgraph url which draws the old images. We plan on leaving 
these in, though obviously future development is based on the new javascript 
page. We have test scripts that check that /rrdgraph will still return image 
files, so it should still remain in future releases 


2) Keep the old /graph. We moved the old /graph into /graphrrd for testing 
purposes. This is likely to be removed in future. At best, we may leave it in 
but it may well break with future UI changes 


3) The times are in UTC only. I don't know how we missed this, but that's a bug 
and we'll get that fixed for 3.5.1. If it is a simple fix, I'll post a link to 
the patch. 


  


Other replies inline.... 


  

On 2 Dec 2009, at 05:59, David LaPorte wrote: 


  

I love the new graphing system.  It's so much easier to get more  
meaningful information out of the graphs rather than having everything  
averaged into oblivion once you get past a day unless you have very  
gradual value changes. 


  


As the backend is still RRD, the averaging will still happen. You'll need ODW 
if you want raw data. 


  


I agree that it's much harder to integrate the generated graphs into  
other applications, though.  You'd have to write your own scripts to  
generate images for you from the RRDs which isn't a big deal but it's  
a lot more work than none.  :) 


  


We did provide embed options though haven't tried it in earnest ourselves yet. 
That's meant to embed the graph in other pages. 


  

I also feel like the drag-zoom selector isn't very accurate.   
Sometimes I have to try a few times to figure out what I actually need  
to hilite to get the information I'm interested in.  The panning  
doesn't work very well either.  Both work great in FireFox.  But not  
in IE or Safari which are the only other browsers that I have tried. 


  


We have tested in IE7/8 and Safari. Is the "snap to now" option on? That 
affects the zooming. 


  



On Nov 27, 2009, at 1:48 AM, Kang wrote:



it's lack of customizable options compare to old rrdgraph( upper/  

lower limit, static cur/min/max legend label, fast static image   

rendering, etc.) 


  


We chose to put the cur/min/max as a hover over because it just took up too 
much graph space. I guess a separate table might be the other place for this 
type of information. 


  


What do you mean by upper/lower limit? I think there are some possible 
optimisations with how the graphs choose the top and bottom values for the 
y-axis. 


  


Ton 


  



-- This message has been checked by ESVA and is believed to be clean. 


-- 
Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail, including attachments, may include 
confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person 
or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the 
intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby 
notified that any dissemination, distribution, copying or taking any action in 
reliance upon this information is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail 
in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this 
e-mail immediately. 

This message has been checked by ESVA and is believed to be clean. 

_______________________________________________
Opsview-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.opsview.org/lists/listinfo/opsview-users

Reply via email to