----
R. Matt Adams - GE Appliances -
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
They couldn't hit an elephant at
this dist-
- Dying words of Union General John
Sedgewick
-----Original Message-----
From: Kevin Kostyszyn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 4:18 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: OT NT2K vs Unix.Oh, and not only that, I like the GUI a lot more than I like command based programming...unless.....can you play solitaire on Unix:)-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Welch
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 3:28 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: OT NT2K vs Unix.From the URL:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/guide/professional/solutions/overview/reliable/default.asp
PCs Stay Up and Running
Memory conflicts and missing or altered system files caused many of the system crashes prior to Windows 2000. To put an end to these problems, we changed Windows 2000 memory management to reduce the chance that software applications will interfere with one another.
Applications runing in a seprate memory area...HMMMMMM Unix did that 15 years ago.
Fewer Reboots
Performing routine maintenance on your system requires significantly fewer reboots, therefore less downtime, with Windows 2000. In addition, with its support for Plug and Play, Windows 2000 automatically recognizes and adapts to hardware changes. This means users can easily add hardware devices such as scanners, DVD players, and speakers without rebooting, and with less potential for user error.
Reboots are also reduced-and reliability increased-through the Microsoft hardware device driver certification program. This program helps ensure that hardware drivers are compatible with Windows 2000, and do not require a reboot after installation. Certified drivers are tested and digitally signed by Microsoft. If Windows 2000 detects a driver that Microsoft has not digitally signed, it warns users about the risk before they install it on their system
Not having to reboot after installing an application....Unix from it's beginings.
How Much More Reliable Is Windows 2000 Professional?
Third-party studies that assess reliability from three different perspectives-lab-based testing, customer-site measurement, and user perceptions-conclude that Windows 2000 Professional is the most reliable desktop operating system.
Highest Reliability in Production Environments
NSTL collected uptime data in the real-world environment of several customer sites and concluded that the average system uptime between failures of Windows 2000 Professional is 13 times more than that of Windows 98 and three times more than that of Windows NT Workstation 4.0.
Notice no comparison to Unix. It's like people that hangout with socially unacceptable people to make themselves look better (Hey! Wait a minute! Is that why alot of people want to hang out with me? ). I guess you're right they aren't the same. Unix posts much higher numbers.
Sorry, it's sarcastic Thursdsay here. I love the debate about Windows and Unix. ;o)
Kevin Kostyszyn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I would disagree with that, how is Windows becoming like Unix?
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rocky Welch
Sennt: Thursday, February 01, 2001 2:01 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: OT NT2K vs Unix.
The same prediction was made at least 5 years ago. At the rate Microsoft is going, Windows will be a direct form of Unix. It becomes more like it with every release.
-Rocky
"Mohan, Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yea, but......
Win2K Datacenter will just decimate Unix. I predict that, in
5 years, there will be two or three Unix vendors, fighting over
the 45% of the market that DataCenter hasn't eaten.
-----Original Message-----
From: Steve Orr [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]]]
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 1:01 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: OT_RE:_Réf._:_Re:_asyn_i/o_on_sun_
Close. It's Dave Cutler. There's too much old DOS/Windows backward
compatibility for WinNT/2000 to achieve stability like VMS despite Cutler's
leadership.
I knew VMS and you, Mr. NT, are no VMS!
With apologies to Senator Bentsen,
Steve Orr
-----Original Message-----
stephane
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 9:22 AM&<
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
NT is based on VMS (talk about a real OS) and if my
memory is good the guy's name is Cutter.
Do I win a toaster ? a microwave oven ? a palm-pilot ?
--- "Mohan, Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : >
"...Standing, corrected, and sniggering....."
> Odd picture, that......
>
>
> Anyways, pop quiz:
>
> On what OS kernel technology is NT based?
>
> Who was the original designer and what was his/her
> first OS?
>
>
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.oraaafaq.com
--
Author: Steve Orr
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California && -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
Do You Yahoo!?
- Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - only $35 a year!
Do You Yahoo!?
- Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail Personal Address - only $35 a year!
