http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/l/locke.htm

--- excerpt ---

   "Since it is the understanding that sets man above the rest of
   sensible beings, and gives him all the advantage and dominion
   which he has over them; it is certainly a subject, even for its
   nobleness, worth our labour to inquire into. The understanding,
   like the eye, while it makes us see and perceive all other things,
   takes no notice of itself; and it requires art and pains to set it
   at a distance and make it its own object. But whatever be the
   difficulties that lie in the way of this inquiry; whatever it be
   that keeps us so much in the dark to ourselves; sure I am that all
   the light we can let in upon our minds, all the acquaintance we
   can make with our own understandings, will not only be very
   pleasant, but bring us great advantage, in directing our thoughts
   in the search of other things.  "
    _Essay_, John Locke


excerpt:

...In Two Treatises of Government he has two purposes in view: to 
refute the doctrine of the divine and absolute right of the Monarch, 
as it had been put forward by Robert Filmer's Patriarcha, and to 
establish a theory which would reconcile the liberty of the citizen 
with political order. 
...
    Although there is little direct reference to Hobbes, Locke seems 
to have had Hobbes in mind when he argued that the doctrine of 
absolute monarchy leaves sovereign and subjects in the state of 
nature towards one another. The constructive doctrines which are 
elaborated in the second treatise became the basis of social and 
political philosophy for generations. 

   ***Labor is the origin and justification of property***; 

   contract or consent is the ground of government and fixes its 
limits. Behind both doctrines lies the idea of the independence of 
the individual person. The state of nature knows no government; but 
in it, as in political society, men are subject to the moral law, 
which is the law of God. Men are born free and equal in rights. 
Whatever a man "mixes his labour with" is his to use. Or, at least, 
this was so in the primitive condition of human life in which there 
was enough for all and "the whole earth was America." Locke sees 
that, when men have multiplied and land has become scarce, rules are 
needed beyond those which the moral law or law of nature supplies. 
But the origin of government is traced not to this economic 
necessity, but to another cause. The moral law is always valid, but 
it is not always kept. In the state of nature all men equally have 
the right to 

   ***punish transgressors***: 

civil society originates when, for the better administration of the 
law, men agree to delegate this function to certain officers. Thus 

   ***government is instituted by a "social contract"***; 

   its powers are limited, and they involve reciprocal obligations; 
moreover, they can be modified or rescinded by the authority which 
conferred them. Locke's theory is thus no more historical than 
Hobbes's. It is a rendering of the facts of constitutional government 
in terms of thought, and it served its purpose as a justification of 
the Revolution settlement in accordance with the ideas of the time.  

...


   "The business of laws, is not to provide for the truth of
    opinions, but for the safety and security of the commonwealth,
    and of every particular man's goods and person. And so it ought
    to be. For truth certainly would do well enough, if she were once
    left to shift for herself. She seldom has received, and I fear
    never will receive, much assistance from the power of great men,
    to whom she is but rarely known, and more rarely welcome. She is
    not taught by laws, nor has she any need of force, to procure her
    entrance into the minds of men. Errors, indeed, prevail by the
    assistance of foreign and borrowed succors. But if truth makes
    not her way into the understanding by her own light, she will be
    but the weaker for any borrowed force violence can add to her. "
     _Treatise of Civil Power in Ecclesiastical Causes_(?), John Locke

...

--- end ---

more from the Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy:

  Property rights: http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/p/property.htm
-
  Social contract: http://www.utm.edu/research/iep/s/soc-cont.htm

--------------------


On 8 Jun 2001, at 9:40, Khedr, Waleed wrote:

> If any one is having a problem with that then I guess they want to be the
> center of the universe and I'd suggest them to get help!

...

-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Eric D. Pierce
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to