Lisa,
It may
be a little late for your needs but I am attending a meeting in London (Oct1
5th) about this very thing. Apparently (and I was blissfully unaware of this)
we run a large-ish (about 70Gb) SQL*Server database for a major communications
company and where costs prohibit the use of Oracle we may see this as a strategy
for the future also, not sure about the parallel server side of things but I'm
sure this will come up in the debate.
I can
let you know on my return what the general feeling was (if its not too late) but
I would also be grateful to be included on any replies to your original
question.
Regards
Lee
-----Original Message-----
From: Koivu, Lisa [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 October 2001 16:50
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: How much data can SQL*Server hold?Hello everyone,
Any of you using SQL*Server on fairly large databases? If so please email me directly.
I have a consulting company telling me they can run a 500GB+ database on SQL*Server with no problems and I'm pretty skeptical. What's the largest implementation of SQL*Server you've seen? Does SQL*Server have parallel server functionality?
Lisa Koivu
Oracle Database Administrator
Fairfield Resorts, Inc.
954-935-4117
The information contained in this communication is
confidential, is intended only for the use of the recipient
named above, and may be legally privileged. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or
copying of this communication is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.
