RE: SQL Server vs. Oracle 9i

[Grabowy, Chris]

But a clueless CIO or IT Director might be persuaded...and that is the problem.  Even more so, when the IT budget is tight...and when is the IT budget not tight?? -----Original Message----- From: Adams, Matthew (GEA, 088130) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 11:23 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: RE: SQL Server vs. Oracle 9i The Walklett Group, the author of the paper cited, is a consulting/services company and has Microsoft listed on their "Alliances" web page, although the exact nature of the relationship is not defined.   The paper makes a number of assumptions that I would question.   After reading it, I do not find it to be a persuasive arguement in favor of the solution recommended (microsoft SQL Server on a Unisys box).   read the white paper for yourself at http://www.microsoft.com/sql/evaluation/compare/WalklettAnalysis.pdf   ---- Matt Adams - GE Appliances - [EMAIL PROTECTED] If C gives you engouth rope to hang yourself, then C++ gives you enough rope to hang yourself, your dog, your co-workers, and everyone in your neighborhood.   -----Original Message----- From: KENNETH JANUSZ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:04 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: SQL Server vs. Oracle 9i This is interesting:   http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews/020403/sfw026_1.html   Ken Janusz, CPIM