Paul,
I am glad you are on your way to 'controlled molecular
restructuring and HP-iozation' (??!) ..;)
Mind telling me What made you say HP's is losing
performance race..?
I am on HP mid level (N class) 4 way server 64 bit and
our Database is 210 Gigs High end OLTP database with 
 > 12 TPS and severe response time restrictions(1 sec
or less.) I am beating the response time by several
milliseconds and I haven't even maxed out the
processors yet...!!

HTH
Cheers,
RS

--- Paul Vallee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is great information Raj. I've run a test that
> is completely consistent
> with this.
> 
> For instance: Go to Metalink and click the "Patches"
> item in the left menu.
> Then choose product family "Oracle Server" and
> product "RDBMS Server",
> release "9.0.1.3".
> Select the "HP9000 Series HP/UX 64-bit" platform and
> choose "All Product
> Patches".
> 
> Repeat for "Sun Sparc Solaris". Although the Sun
> list is quite lengthy
> compared to most other platforms (7 entries), the HP
> list has significantly
> more patches (15 entries).
> 
> For me, this is a significant decision influencer
> when choosing a platform
> for Oracle. However, HP is definitely losing the
> performance race... :-)
> Tough one.
> 
> Thanks again,
> Paul
> ---
> www.pythian.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- 877-PYTHIAN
> Smarter than adding another team member, Pythian has
> new services for
> supplementing DBAs: get our help with monitoring,
> 24x7 on-call, daily
> verifications, storage management, performance and
> more.
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 2:32 PM
> 
> 
> Paul ,
> ORACLE switched from solaris to HP-UX somewhere in
> mid
> 2000 for their tier I platform. ALso I think at 
> this
> time compaq and HP are the only true 64 bit
> architectures available. That of course swings the
> scale in HPs favour...:)
> 
> Cheers,
> RS
> --- Paul Vallee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Might as well get my two cents in... :-)
> >
> > 1. Solaris
> > Tied for 2... AIX, Tru64, HP/UX
> >
> > (leaving NUMA out of the equation for now. If you
> > like NUMA, then look into
> > the status of IBM's acquisition of Sequent, I'm
> out
> > of touch with that right
> > now.)
> >
> > Different hardware solutions from different
> vendors
> > have different
> > performance, stability and cost characteristics,
> and
> > so I'll assume that all
> > vendors have an appropriate solution on these
> > factors, this may not be the
> > case.
> >
> > With these assumptions, the primary factor for me
> is
> > the timeliness of the
> > availability of releases, patches and patchsets.
> Sun
> > Solaris 32-bit is the
> > winner on this factor on the grounds that it is
> > Oracle's internal
> > development platform. All other platforms are
> ported
> > from Sun Solaris
> > 32-bit. When that changes, my recommendation would
> > of course also change, as
> > it did when Oracle moved away from Digital/VMS.
> >
> > Anyone who has been in a situation where a bug was
> > causing service failure
> > and who heard that a patch was available for
> Solaris
> > but not your platform
> > knows where I'm coming from on this one.
> >
> > Note: for the exact same reason, never use 64-bit
> > Oracle on Solaris unless
> > you absolutely need the very-large-sga support.
> > 64-bit Oracle on Solaris is
> > slow to get patches and releases.
> >
> > Best,
> > Paul
> > ---
> > www.pythian.com -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] --
> 877-PYTHIAN
> > Smarter than adding another team member, Pythian
> has
> > new services for
> > supplementing DBAs: get our help with monitoring,
> > 24x7 on-call, daily
> > verifications, storage management, performance and
> > more.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:48 PM
> >
> >
> > What are you planning..? A religious war..:)
> > well..here is my 2 cents,IMHO
> > 1. HP-UX
> > 2. SOlaris
> > 3. AIX
> >
> > in the order of preference. I have worked with all
> > three and I found HP machines to be  reliable and
> > HP-UX easy to work with. This is not to say
> solaris
> > is
> > not but I had some nightmare stroies to tell about
> > the
> > bugs and quality of support from SUN. Again this
> is
> > only my opinion and as everybody knows OS is ,to
> > some
> > extent ,a matter of personal choice also.
> > ( Running to put on flame proof suit..:) )
> >
> > Cheers,
> > RS
> > --- "Bunyamin K. Karadeniz"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > We are searching about which unix is best ?
> > > We will apply 9ias and 8.1.7 DB . plus Oracle
> > > Portal.
> > > Can you direct me to a link for comparison about
> > > SOLARIS , AIX , HP-UX  for performance and other
> > > options ..
> > > Thank you ...
> > >
> > >
> > > Bunyamin K. Karadeniz
> > > Oracle DBA / Developer
> > > Civilian IT Department
> > > Havelsan A.S. Eskisehir yolu
> > > 7.km Ankara Turkey
> > > Phone: +90 312 2873565 / 1217
> > > Mobile : +90 535 3357729
> > >
> > > The degree of normality in a database
> > > is inversely proportional to that of its DBA.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
> > http://taxes.yahoo.com/
> > --
> > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
> > http://www.orafaq.com
> > --
> > Author: Sakthi , Raj
> >   INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051 
> FAX:
> > (858) 538-5051
> > San Diego, California        -- Public Internet
> > access / Mailing Lists
> >
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an
> > E-Mail message
> > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of
> > 'ListGuru') and in
> > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB
> > ORACLE-L
> > (or the name of mailing list you want to be
> removed
> > from).  You may
> > also send the HELP command for other information
> > (like subscribing).
> >
> >
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Tax Center - online filing with TurboTax
http://taxes.yahoo.com/
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- 
Author: Sakthi , Raj
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- (858) 538-5051  FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California        -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to