Nice to hear from you Walt. I'd begun to think you'd crashed your sailplane into the side of a mountain or something. :)
Jared On Friday 05 April 2002 09:08, Weaver, Walt wrote: > As Steve's bunkermate I'll second the Linux thing. We're having good luck > with Linux here. > > I've done AIX and Solaris, and Linux is up there with'em. > > --Walt Weaver > Bozeman, Montana > > -----Original Message----- > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 9:31 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > > Lot's of listers have presented nice lists but if you don't have Linux on > your list then your experience is woefully incomplete. Long live Linux! The > war is on and those who don't join this camp soon will find themselves on > the losing side! :-) > > I did HPUX. I did Solaris. Now I'm doing Linux and life is wonderful. > > Unopinionatedly yours, > Archie Bunker Steve Orr > > > -----Original Message----- > Sent: Friday, April 05, 2002 8:34 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > > My experiance is just the opposite : > > 1. Solaris > 2. Solaris > 3. Solaris > 4. HP-UX > 5. AIX > 6. Digital Unix > 7. SCO Unix > > Solaris has much better features and is more reliable as per my experience. > For eg. only Solaris provides the option to use Asynchronous I/O for file > systems > as well as raw devices. Asynchronous I/O on HP will b used only while > accessing > raw devices. > I think that the Oracle software is primarily written on Solaris these > days. > > Samir > > Samir Sarkar > Oracle DBA > SchlumbergerSema > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Phone : +44 (0) 115 - 957 6028 > EPABX : +44 (0) 115 - 957 6418 Ext. 76028 > Fax : +44 (0) 115 - 957 6018 > > > -----Original Message----- > Sent: 05 April 2002 15:08 > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > > Well, I will put in my two cents since everyone else is. > 1.HP-UX > 2.HP-UX > 3.HP-UX > 4.Solaris > > > Oracle works equally well on both of them (IMO) but HP provides you with > better support, better hardware, better reliability, etc. Course, none > of that is free. > > All in all I have not been disappointed per say with Solaris (which > is a good thing cause I will be working with it ALOT from here on > it) but I have had far less issues with HP. > > -----Original Message----- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Thursday, April 04, 2002 12:09 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > > Another shot across the bow: > > Hp-UX if you like to sleep at night > Solaris if you want speed and sleepless nights > Aix if neither of the above is of any value in your life > Linux if both are valuable & $$$ are a consideration > > Dick Goulet > > ____________________Reply Separator____________________ > Author: "Gene Sais" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 4/4/2002 9:24 AM > > here go the wars :) > 1. Solaris > 2. HP UX > 3. IBM AIX > > imho, in order. this is definitely in the archives. > > gene > > >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 04/04/02 11:36AM >>> > > We are searching about which unix is best ? > We will apply 9ias and 8.1.7 DB . plus Oracle Portal. > Can you direct me to a link for comparison about SOLARIS , AIX , HP-UX for > performance and other options .. > Thank you ... > > > Bunyamin K. Karadeniz > Oracle DBA / Developer > Civilian IT Department > Havelsan A.S. Eskisehir yolu > 7.km Ankara Turkey > Phone: +90 312 2873565 / 1217 > Mobile : +90 535 3357729 > > The degree of normality in a database > is inversely proportional to that of its DBA. -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Jared Still INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).