-- Gurelei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 05/10/02 10:43:23 -0800
> Hi.
>
> We are designing a small database using a data
> warehousing desing. We have created a 3rd normal form
> and are now debating whether and how to denormalize
> it. I see the pluses of denormalization - easier
> queries creation and tuning. What are the
> disadvantages that we should be aware of? Wasted space
> is not an issue because the tables a pretty small.
> What else should we consider as a potential issue?
Oracle was designed (and still is) an OLTP tool. It doesn't
do very well with fully denormalized data. Wasted space is
only one problem, bloated indexes are another. You can also
end up with indexes that lack enough entropy for general
use due to repatition, leaving you better off with table
scans in most cases.
For a small(ish) database there may not be any real
difference between a snowflake and star schema, but
databases tend to grow. Every time I've dealt with any
denormalized schemas in Oracle they have performed poorly
(or crashed).
--
Steven Lembark 2930 W. Palmer
Workhorse Computing Chicago, IL 60647
+1 800 762 1582
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
--------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
