Thanks Chris, So than any clues how to resolve this issue, as earliest, becuase this is causing bottleneck in our application .
Rgds, Marul. ----- Original Message ----- To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, September 05, 2002 2:29 AM > Good question, Jared! Perhaps 'overflow' is technically not the correct > term to use to decribe this scenario but it seemed to fit the bill > sufficiently to mail off a quick one-liner solution without going into great > depth. Some of us have work to do, you know ;) > > To redeem myself I probably should have mentioned that this table sounds > pretty volatile. Consequently the index(es) are likely to end up fairly > disorganized, especially if the 350k records are being inserted in > ascending order. Once you start adding levels to the index things start to > slow down.... > > Chris > > -----Original Message----- > Sent: 04 September 2002 16:50 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Wednesday 04 September 2002 04:23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > It sounds to me like the indexes are going into overflow - this will cause > > What do you mean by 'overflow'? > > Jared > > > the insert time to increase. I would suggest batching up the inserts, > > dropping the indexes, running the inserts and re-creating the indexes. > > > > Chris > > > > -----Original Message----- > > Sent: 04 September 2002 07:53 > > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > > > > > Hi All, > > > > We have a table which can contain more than half a million records. When > we > > try to insert some 10k records in the empty table it get inserted in 10 > > min. but as the size increases time taken to insert also increases. After > > 350,000 records it takes around an hour to insert 10k records. > > There are around 15 columns in it out of which 11 are indexed. There is > one > > concatenated function-based index on two columns of Varchar type and two > > separate index for the same two columns. > > > > I have checked the free space for the tablespaces to which the table and > > indexes are attached to. They are in two separate tbs. > > > > Any clues why this is happenning. > > > > TIA > > Marul. > > ---------------------------------------- > Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1"; name="Attachment: 1" > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Description: > ---------------------------------------- > -- > Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com > -- > Author: > INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 > San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message > to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in > the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L > (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may > also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing). > > -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com -- Author: Marul Mehta INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051 San Diego, California -- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists -------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
