> The overhead of the repository database is more. With the initial
releases of RMAN (EBU) Oracle was rightly
> criticized for the fact that you had to backup the database that holds
information about the database you want to backup.
> Getting rid of this silliness seems reasonable to me.
Why silly?
It isn't any more silly than making a separate backup of the Veritas
Netbackup catalog.
It's just a different level of abstraction.
Jared
"Orr, Steve" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/09/2003 08:45 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE: RE : RMAN Repository
If you aren't using a repository all you have to do is make sure control
file backups are part of the routine. There are 2 ways to backup the
backup metadata: 1) the RMAN repository database; 2) backup controlfiles.
Functionally and operationally they're pretty much the same. The only
things you can't do with controlfile RMAN/database metadata is: 1) use
previous "incarnations" of the database for recovery; 2) use database
stored scripts. No big deal as far as I'm concerned.
When RMAN first came out a separate repository database was a requirement.
Subsequent releases added some functionality for using controlfiles. The
vulnerability of losing the repository or losing the backup controlfile is
about equivalent. The overhead of the repository database is more. With
the initial releases of RMAN (EBU) Oracle was rightly criticized for the
fact that you had to backup the database that holds information about the
database you want to backup. Getting rid of this silliness seems
reasonable to me.
Steve Orr-man for RMAN,
Bozeman, Montana
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 2:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Importance: High
And how does one go about restoring a database when all control files
are lost, and the only recovery data is stored in the control file?
This doesn't sound very reasonable.
Jared
"Deshpande, Kirti" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
01/08/2003 11:44 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
cc:
Subject: RE : RMAN Repository
Joe,
That's what I have heard (from 2 Oracle University
Professors/Lecturers/Demonstrators). But no one would tell me when it may
happen. We do not use RMAN (yet) so I did not pursue it further.
- Kirti
-----Original Message-----
Sent: Wednesday, January 08, 2003 1:08 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
<snip>
Obilgatory oracle statement/question: rumor has it by some instructors
that RMAN repository is going away and only control file recoveries
will be possible, truth or fiction?
joe
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
--
Author:
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
