On Friday 31 January 2003 07:09, Michael Fontana wrote:
>
> Still, some of the queries in Siebel SEEM to run better using CBO.  Is
> there any way to mix and match approaches?  To use RBO by default, but
> perhaps CBO might make sense for certain queries, and perhaps some     
> AD-HOC?

The problem with using CBO for 'some' queries is that analyzing a table
turns on CBO for every query the table is used in, not just the ones
you wish.

Tony's approach sounds interesting enough to make me start playing
with plan stabilility.  Like I don't have enough to do.  :)

Jared
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jared Still
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to