|
hey folks..
Hoping for
a little feedback and opinion please. Having a discussion with the development
group ...
The development
group is thinking that a VERY LARGE SGA would solve some of their I/O problems.
For example, they believe that a SGA consisting of over 8GB of db block buffers
would resolve their multitude of issues. I feel that they open another can
of worms with something such as this.. And granted-there hasn't really been an
infrastructure evaluation-and the SA group is currently performing that review
of the environment.
One could suggest
that they could "cache" some very large tables in the SGA; but there seems to be
some sense of a down side to this.. Could you all provide some input on
"Extremely large SGA's"? In the area of 8GB or so.. BUT, most of
this would be the database blocks. Would you all be so kinds to provide your
thoughts please?
TIA
Greg Loughmiller
|
- RE: Big SGA....... Loughmiller, Greg
- RE: Big SGA....... Cary Millsap
- RE: Big SGA....... Stephen Lee
- Re: Big SGA....... Tim Gorman
- RE: Big SGA....... Stephen Lee
- Re: Big SGA....... Jonathan Lewis
- RE: Big SGA....... Loughmiller, Greg
- RE: Big SGA....... Loughmiller, Greg
- Re: Big SGA....... Tim Gorman
- Re: Big SGA....... Connor McDonald
- Re: Big SGA....... Anjo Kolk
