Title: Message
We are also finding difficulties with a mixed Oracle environment.
 
We are running AIX 4.3.3-ML10, Oracle 8.1.7.3-EE-64 bit, PeopleSoft 8.18 and moving to Oracle 9.2.0.2. In the past, when moving to a new Oracle release, we would install the software, upgrade our listener, and then start to upgrade our instances, one by one. This go around, after upgrading our listener to 9.2.0.2, when PeopleSoft tries to connect to a 8.1.7.3 database using the 9.2.0.2 listener, the process fails with the message "ORA-01890 NLS error detected". This is happening both when a PS App Server is connecting to Oracle and when the PS client program connects in 2-tier mode. We didn't see this type of behavior with other tools (SQL+, Toad, etc.) connecting to Oracle, so we thought it was a PS problem and reported it to their support center without much progress. In the mean time, we have reconfigured so that we are now running 2 listeners on the box, one for Oracle 8i and one for Oracle 9iR2. So far, we have not found a problem with Oracle 9iR2 databases interacting with like listeners, but our testing continues.
 
If anyone else on this list can shine some light on this problem, please do.
 
-- *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*
  Stephen T. Murphy 
  Manager, Database and Technical Support
  ITS - University Applications Development
  MSC-100
  The University at Albany, S.U.N.Y
  Albany,  New York    12222           
  Phone: (518) 437-4523     Fax: (518) 437-4540   
 
MailTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]     AIM: SMurphy199
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:05 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: 8i databases under 9i listener?

RS6000 running AIX 4.3.3.     We are experiencing the following issues with
our 8.1.7.4 databases under a 9.2.0.1 listener.

1) PL/SQL procedures utilizing UTL_FILE fail with INVALID_PATH errors when
   attempting to open a file.

2) Database links from WE8ISO8859P1 databases to UTF8 databases fail
   with ORA-3113.   Database links work fine as long as the character set
   is the same on both databases.

We've checked, and double-check, all environment variables, O/S permissions,
and so forth.   Oracle Support has been basically useless.  Eventually,
they stated that these problems are unique to the AIX platform, and not something
that they've seen on HP or Solaris, and recommended running both the 8i and
9i listeners, in other words, they had no clue.

The sequence of events went like this:

Feb 7th   -- 9.2.0.1 was installed on our test/development box, on which there
             are eight 8.1.7.4 instances running.

Feb 14th  -- We startup the 9i listener and shutdown the 8i listener. 

Feb 21st  -- First upgrade of an 8.1.7.4 database to 9.2.0.1.   The upgrade was
             successful.  

The funny thing is that none of the 8.1.7.4 databases had any problems with the
9i listener from Feb 14th to Feb 21st, either with UTL_FIL or with database links.  

But on Feb 21st, after the first 9.2.0.1 database upgrade, the 9i listener was
bounced for the first time since it's inception, and then all the problems started.   

We are back to running both an 8i and 9i listener for the time being, but I have
a lurking suspicion that something is not right somewhere, and could come back
and bite us in the future.  
   


--------------------------------------------
Jeffery D Thomas
DBA
Thomson Information Services
Thomson, Inc.

Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Indy DBA Master Documentation available at:
http://gkmqp.tce.com/tis_dba
Select 'Indy DBA' then 'DBA Web Pages'
--------------------------------------------



-----------------------------------------------------------
As of February 12, 2003 Thomson unified its email addresses on a worldwide basis.  Please note my new email address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thomson is the leader in solutions and technologies for the entertainment and media industries and serves its customers under its four strategic brands: Technicolor, Grass Valley, RCA and THOMSON.

More about Thomson: http://www.thomson.net/videochain

Reply via email to