Yes. We have a 9.2.0.4 test system based on the "How to Build a $1000 RAC" whitepaper (www.bradmark.com/site2/products/pdfs/9irac_config.pdf), although we spent about $1100. After much ado about everything, it's been up and running on RH9 for almost a month uninterrupted (would've been 2 or 3 months, but we had a planned power outtage while I was out pretending to actually be of some help to my newborn and these boxes are on a desk with no UPS).
I've done sporadic tests. A co-worker came over and was wondering what the noisy external SCSI drive was clicking about, we got to talking about HA, and I decided to power off one of the boxes. No TAF or anything, but box #2 went chugging along with only a 1-3 second pause in activity. I've only put a modest load on the RAC, but so far so good. The thing that gets me is anything RedHat and Oracle is a huge pain. RAC only makes it worse. I've just done my second Oracle install on Gentoo Linux without any issues whatsoever. Hmmmm... My $.02, Rich Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA -----Original Message----- Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:45 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L the guy who spoke from oracle said that 9.2 is much better than 9.0.1 RAC. anyone use it? -- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net -- Author: Jesse, Rich INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fat City Network Services -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com San Diego, California -- Mailing list and web hosting services --------------------------------------------------------------------- To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L (or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
