OK, that's what I get for not R'ing all TFMs before opening my mouth -- is
"active-active" Oracle RAC-based failover as opposed to OS-based failover?

Rich

Rich Jesse                           System/Database Administrator
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                  Quad/Tech Inc, Sussex, WI USA

-----Original Message-----
Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 2:05 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L


We have been production on 9202 for a while and testing 9204. Our experience
is good ... we run active-active.

Raj
-- 
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.net
-- 
Author: Jesse, Rich
  INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Fat City Network Services    -- 858-538-5051 http://www.fatcity.com
San Diego, California        -- Mailing list and web hosting services
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To REMOVE yourself from this mailing list, send an E-Mail message
to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (note EXACT spelling of 'ListGuru') and in
the message BODY, include a line containing: UNSUB ORACLE-L
(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from).  You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).

Reply via email to