Alex! > > am I right that I can handle an arbitrary number of outputs by overriding > > createOutput in ProcessorImpl? Is it right that my processor should then > > extend ProcessorImpl directly (and not SimpleProcessor)? > > Martin, yes, this is correct.
Great, thanks a lot! > Note that you can also have more than > one output by extending SimpleProcessor by implementing multiple > generateSomething() methods (e.g. generateFoo and generateBar if you > want to have two outputs "foo" and "bar"). Yes, but if I this understand right, I've to know in advance which outputs I've, while via createOutput(), I get all defined outputs, right? (BTW: Do I get all defined outputs, or only those that are connected to another input?) Greetings, Martin ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: Sybase ASE Linux Express Edition - download now for FREE LinuxWorld Reader's Choice Award Winner for best database on Linux. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5588&alloc_id=12065&op=click _______________________________________________ orbeon-user mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/orbeon-user
