realize that XPL is more complicated than it looks.
There was a comment that mentioned that XSLT also has a loose execution path, but you can "call" a
named template.
So, I am wondering if the behavior is closer to calling a named template or calling a template with a mode ?
Question? can you insure execution of a pipeline
if it has an output and you call the null serializer
to consume the output? Would that be a kind of legacy "kludge" like cat "/dev/null>/tmp/logfile"
Then, you have to make an output, a slightly redundant effort.
I hesitate to say I favor this, but I would not necessarily say it is a kludge. I applaud your willingness to expand xpl, but I offer this fairly easy to document strategy.
(If I am playing on the same field...)
Regards, Hank
Eric van der Vlist wrote:
[snip]
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ orbeon-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/orbeon-user
