Eric van der Vlist wrote:
> xml:base is different IMO. Supporting xml:base has an impact on the > vocabulary since your href wouldn't have exactly the same behaviour.
Good point. The schema would still have to be aware of it though, that's thing in common with other foreign attribute.
> Users who can write XPL pipes are probably wise enough to use the > possibility offered by the language...
I would guess so.
> In a sense, this is almost what RNG specifies... > > What you suggest here is to "externalise" this simplification while I > think it could be internal :-) ...
I was just suggesting it as a workaround for now. That may be a better solution than embedding the information in the theme stylesheet.
> BTW, this approach (full, simplified, simplification) is something > that might help you describing XPL. It lets you concentrate on > defining the semantics of the simplified set and easily add features > through this simplification process without changing the semantics > of the simplified set. I find that very powerful and quite generic.
Full / simplified is just a syntax aspect, right? While simplification is more related to how to process the language.
At any rate I am adding an RFE to suggest opening up the schema of the PFC to foreign attributes and elements. That's still a subject of discussion of course ;-)
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1113344&group_id=116683&atid=675663
-Erik
------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IntelliVIEW -- Interactive Reporting Tool for open source databases. Create drag-&-drop reports. Save time by over 75%! Publish reports on the web. Export to DOC, XLS, RTF, etc. Download a FREE copy at http://www.intelliview.com/go/osdn_nl _______________________________________________ orbeon-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/orbeon-user
