Pre 1.0 this is not something I would expect but is a nice to have.
 Hopefully by time 1.0 comes out it will be so solid that the only thing you
will ever need to update is the Core Modules and not the entire system.

-Bret

On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 2:56 PM, Bertrand Le Roy <
[email protected]> wrote:

>  Sure it’s frustrating but we’ve been doing some very major refactoring so
> supporting the 0.5 schema would have necessitated drastic cuts in features.
> We are already focusing on the absolutely necessary features. What happens
> after 1.0 is going to be a wholly different story but we’re not there yet so
> there is some churn associated with early adopting. We’ll do what we can to
> alleviate the pain. Thank you all for your continued support.
>
>
>
> *From:* Jason N. Gaylord [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 25, 2010 1:40 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Orchard 0.8 is available!
>
>
>
> +1 – It’s frustrating when you have a project that can’t support just
> swapping out the .dlls and “core” files.
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bret Ferrier <[email protected]>
>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 25, 2010 4:06 PM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Re: Orchard 0.8 is available!
>
>
>
> I really like the BlogML module(seems great as is) but I see that as more
> of something that helps me import/export my blog not something that I would
> use to migrate from one version of Orchard to another.   I would expect at
> some point to to be able to keep my content DB/App_Data and just replace the
> code and for Orchard to update all of the tables and keep the content
> pages/images etc intact.   With the re-writing of the Theme engine I
> wouldn't expect this from .5 to .8 but was wondering if I moved to .8 today
> if in a few months when 1.0 comes out if there will be a migration path.
> -Bret
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Nicholas Mayne <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> I was thinking of changing my BlogML module is to something more generic...
> i.e. something that takes word press files as well as other schema... Is
> this what you are looking at?
>
>
>
> *From:* Bertrand Le Roy [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* 25 October 2010 18:03
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* RE: Orchard 0.8 is available!
>
>
>
> I’ve been working on the side on a general purpose import/export module for
> Orchard but I can’t predict yet when I’ll be done or how complete it will
> be. In the meantime, the blogging data should be transferrable using Nick’s
> BlogML module (once it’s on the 0.8 gallery).
>
> But I run my own instance of 0.5 in production so I need it as badly as
> anyone.
>
>
>
> *From:* Bret Ferrier [mailto:[email protected]]
> *Sent:* Monday, October 25, 2010 8:33 AM
> *To:* [email protected]
> *Subject:* Re: Orchard 0.8 is available!
>
>
>
> I was wondering the same thing as Jason.  At what point is Orchard going to
> account for updating between versions?  If there is no upgrade path between
> .5 and .8 will there be one between .8 and 1.0 or will there be no work put
> into this until Orchard comes out of beta?
>
> -Bret @runxc1
>
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 9:25 AM, Jason N. Gaylord <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> Is the project “safe” for a “go-live” instance yet? If so, like another
> question was asked, will there be some sort of update script?
>
>
>
> Jason
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Bradley Millington <[email protected]>
>
> *Sent:* Monday, October 25, 2010 4:15 AM
>
> *To:* [email protected]
>
> *Subject:* Orchard 0.8 is available!
>
>
>
> Hi all –
>
>
>
> Forgive the terse email, but I wanted to let you all know that the Orchard
> 0.8 release is officially live:
>
>
>
> http://orchardproject.net
>
> http://orchard.codeplex.com/releases/view/49388
>
>
>
> The Outercurve Foundation will be publishing a blog post about the release
> early tomorrow.
>
>
>
> We are especially proud of this release, as it finally brings the
> long-promised theme engine to life.  We added widget support as the icing on
> the cake.
>
>
>
> The docs for this release are a little behind, but we are working to catch
> up the docs as quickly as possible.  In the meantime, the Orchard
> Discussions on codeplex are always good place to tap the expertise of the
> Orchard team to get your questions answered.
>
>
>
> Enjoy!
>
> Bradley (on behalf of the rest of the Orchard team)
>
>
>
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as:
> [email protected].
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email protected]
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email protected]<[email protected]>
>
>
> --- You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as:
> [email protected]. To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as: [email protected].
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email protected]<[email protected]>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email protected]<[email protected]>
>
>
> --- You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as:
> [email protected]. To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email protected]
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as:
> [email protected].
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email protected]<[email protected]>
>  ---
> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as: [email protected].
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email protected]
>


---
You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[email protected]

Reply via email to