If Orchard was able to run on Mono, it means it would be able to run on
Linux, thus opening up a wider user base, and possibly entering companies
and government agancies that are opensource only.

Simone

On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 11:23 AM, Curt Christianson
<[email protected]>wrote:

> But why? Sure it can be done but why should it? Can anyone honestly say
> that Orchard on Mono will really have any significant user base? Its what I
> would consider a fringe request at best. In fact I'd go as far as to say
> this discussion alone is more interested in it than any other real-world
> numbers. I think the team has done a fairly solid job of keeping the
> scope-drift in check, let's non inundate them at the end with the "oh, would
> it be cool if....." type stuff. It's what ends up killing most open source
> projects, let's not bury this thing with "extras", that's what the community
> can do when its actually released.
>
> - Curt
> ------------------------------
> *From: * Simone Chiaretta <[email protected]>
> *Date: *Tue, 16 Nov 2010 09:43:25 +0100
> *To: *<[email protected]>
> *ReplyTo: * [email protected]
> *Subject: *Re: Plans for mono
>
> +1
> I think that Mono compatibility is pretty easy to achieve since asp.netmvc 
> works on Mono, MEF works on Mono and I think also NH works on Mono.
> And Mono is already .NET4 compatible
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:25 AM, Ken Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Another -1 .
>>
>> Screw mono. Let's focus on the majority audience.
>>
>> Ken
>>
>> -----Original Message----- From: Curt Christianson
>> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 5:04 PM
>>
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Plans for mono
>>
>> -1
>> There are WAY more, better things to spend the time on. Orchard is already
>> getting extremely complex for a midlevel developer and to start altering the
>> base to accommodate a different platform.
>> I know that for me the entire product is nearly out of my time allotment
>> to understand.
>>
>> - Curt
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: "Stone, Andrew" <[email protected]>
>> Date: Tue, 16 Nov 2010 08:56:20
>> To: <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: [email protected]: RE: Plans for mono
>>
>> +1
>>
>> NB: I run Linux as my everyday OS
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Davide Vernole [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Tuesday, 16 November 2010 6:21 AM
>> To: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: Plans for mono
>>
>> + 1
>> _________________________________________________
>>
>> Davide Vernole | Microsoft MVP Visual Studio ALM
>>
>> Microsoft Certified Application Developer
>> Microsoft Certified Solution Developer
>>
>> email: [email protected]  | Mobile: +39.335.243456
>> Website: http://www.knodev.com | Blog: http://blog.knodev.com
>>
>> On 15/nov/2010, at 20.04, Bertrand Le Roy wrote:
>>
>>  There are no plans for that at the moment, no. But I'd be interested to
>>> know how many people on this list would be interested?
>>>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Scott Cate [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Monday, November 15, 2010 9:16 AM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Plans for mono
>>>
>>> Sorry if this has been covered.
>>>
>>> Any plans or thoughts on an Orchard version under Mono, to run on a Linux
>>> box?
>>>
>>> -- @ScottCate (Sent from mobile)
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as:
>>> [email protected].
>>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>> ---
>>> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as: [email protected].
>>>
>>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>>> [email protected]
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as:
>> [email protected].
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>> [email protected]
>>
>>
>> Please consider the environment before printing this email.
>>
>> _____________________________________________________________________
>> The information contained in this e-mail communication may be
>> confidential. You should only read, disclose, re-transmit, copy, distribute,
>> act in reliance on or commercialise the information if you are authorised to
>> do so. If you are not the intended recipient of this e-mail communication,
>> please immediately notify the sender by e-mail and then destroy any
>> electronic or paper copy of this message.
>>
>> Any views expressed in this e-mail communication are those of the
>> individual sender, except where the sender specifically states them to be
>> the views of PBLMedia. PBLMedia does not represent, warrant or guarantee
>> that the integrity of this communication has been maintained nor that the
>> communication is free of errors, virus or interference.
>>
>> ---
>> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as: [email protected]
>> .
>>
>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>> [email protected]
>> b‹š­ç.®·§¶\¬¹»
>> ®&ÞvÚ(­ÈZ­×b±Ë¬±«$ŽŠ\†‹fj)\¢dèº{.nÇ+‰·¬zwZnV§‘隊[h•æ¯zŠÜ…ªÝv+
>> ºË5ç­tõIb²Û(º×«rêïzŠà
>>
>> ---
>> You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as:
>> [email protected].
>> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
>> [email protected]
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Simone Chiaretta
> Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
> Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
> RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
> twitter: @simonech
>
> Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
> "Life is short, play hard"
>  --- You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as:
> [email protected]. To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> [email protected]




-- 
Simone Chiaretta
Microsoft MVP ASP.NET - ASPInsider
Blog: http://codeclimber.net.nz
RSS: http://feeds2.feedburner.com/codeclimber
twitter: @simonech

Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic
"Life is short, play hard"


---
You are currently subscribed to orchard-discuss as: [email protected].
To unsubscribe send a blank email to 
[email protected]

Reply via email to